| The Leslieviller will always be free to use. Donations are sincerely appreciated. |
Follow activity on The Leslieviller in your favorite social networks: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks to our advertisers for keeping this site free to use! If you'd like to advertise on The Leslieviller, start with this information.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Andrew JM on June 10, 2011 at 4:50pm I can't think of a single multi unit building to hit the Leslieville/Riverside market over the past few years that hasn't looked great. Then we get one greedy developer from Vancouver looking to cash in on Toronto's booming condo market and this is the best they can do. They would never get away with a crappy design like this in their home town. They obviously don't care at all about our little nook of hte city. I wonder if the developer has even been to Toronto let alone Leslieville/Riverside.
I'm going to see if I can get Christiphor Hume involved. Let's send this developer a clear message, design well or get the hell out of our city.
Permalink Reply by Greg H on June 10, 2011 at 4:55pm Still no flyers in our very nearby home mailboxes, but Paula personally dropped off enough at Morse St. School to go home with every student!
Permalink Reply by Andrew JM on June 10, 2011 at 5:19pm
Permalink Reply by Andrew JM on June 10, 2011 at 5:20pm The meeting notification was primarily via email. Email Paula Fletcher (councillor_fletcher@toronto.ca) to get on her mailing list. The posters were only a reminder.
Marla Good said:Still no flyers in our very nearby home mailboxes, but Paula personally dropped off enough at Morse St. School to go home with every student!
Permalink Reply by Leslie Barns on June 10, 2011 at 5:58pm
Permalink Reply by Leslie Barns on June 10, 2011 at 10:36pm
Permalink Reply by Cooper on June 11, 2011 at 10:34am I don't think residents have any official influence at this point, Scratch. This project was fully permitted years ago, It's my understanding that the only way it could be reopened would be if there were sufficient variations to have the city declare it a new project. Then it would have to be re-permited, which would make subject to the city's new OP and design standards.
Scratch Egg said:
Just out of curiosity, what power does a group of naysayers in the hood have against a developer like this? Is this the same application as the big box store story?
Permalink Reply by Andrew JM on June 11, 2011 at 11:29am I don't think residents have any official influence at this point, Scratch. This project was fully permitted years ago, It's my understanding that the only way it could be reopened would be if there were sufficient variations to have the city declare it a new project. Then it would have to be re-permited, which would make subject to the city's new OP and design standards.
Scratch Egg said:
Just out of curiosity, what power does a group of naysayers in the hood have against a developer like this? Is this the same application as the big box store story?
Permalink Reply by Leslie Barns on June 11, 2011 at 3:00pm
Permalink Reply by Ara Mamourian on June 11, 2011 at 3:04pm
Permalink Reply by Leslie Barns on June 11, 2011 at 3:08pm
Permalink Reply by Ara Mamourian on June 11, 2011 at 3:17pm Investors buy anything that will generate easy rental income but end users buy the larger units so if you have a 3 bedroom unit that offers zero natural light in the principal rooms then the end user won't buy, if you build a terrible looking building then an end user won't buy. At the end of the day the end user gets the development built not the investor that buys the $225K unit.
Scratch Egg said:
Really? I would think that people set a price and hunt around. They see "Leslieville" and they run to see it. Or purchase before they know what 23 square feet looks like.
Posted by Nolin (Admin) on February 3, 2011 at 12:21pm 4 Comments 5 Likes
© 2013 Created by Nolin (Admin).



