| The Leslieviller will always be free to use. Donations are sincerely appreciated. |
Follow activity on The Leslieviller in your favorite social networks: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks to our advertisers for keeping this site free to use! If you'd like to advertise on The Leslieviller, start with this information.
Comment
Comment by Greig on March 1, 2011 at 4:05pm Liz, I'm not trying to pick a fight with you or treat you like 'the enemy'. Like I said, I like you, I think you have great energy. You are a public figure and people listen to what you have to say. With that comes some responsibility to ensure you are not stating opinions as fact, particularly when those 'facts' are inaccurate. You're not the first person on the Leslieviller to do this on this issue (and I've been quick to call them out, too). I truly don't know if it's intentionally spreading false information to further a particular agenda, or just plain ignorance on the subject; I hope it's the latter, but really neither are acceptable.
Our transit system is in poor condition; we badly need these new LRV's to replace our aging fleet, our city depends on it. We also need to be able to store and maintain them, something that cannot be done with our current facilities. At some point these vehicles have to make a journey from a populated area that the vehicles service, to a (preferrably) unpopulated area to be stored and maintained. I applaud the efforts that have and will be made to choose a route that affects the least amount of residents and businesses, and mitigate the effects on those that are affected. But at some point we have to accept that there are compromises to living in a big city, and traffic noise is one of them, especially if you choose to live on a major arterial route.
So I have a problem with people who spread false information (either willingly or unintentionally) in order to delay or cancel needed upgrades to our public transit system.
Yes, you simply wanted to post a letter from Rob Ford. It's inconvenient that knowledgable people have called him and you out on inaccurate 'information' or have disagreed with your position. If you're going to publish your opinion in a public forum, you are going to have to be prepared to back it up.
Comment by Liz West on March 1, 2011 at 3:17pm Greig & Scratch - this is a place for people to share thoughts and information. I began this post with an email from the Mayor which I wanted everyone to have the chance to read. It's that simple. I don't think it's helpful if you treat people like the enemy Greig. Passing judgement is easy. I believe we share a common goal.
Comment by Boris E on March 1, 2011 at 2:37pm 2nd part - balance of my previous post below:
In addition, what this city also needs is a more integrated approach to public transit. Consider advanced green traffic lights for street cars, so they get first and faster through intersections. Consider restrictions for cars on street car routes during rush hour traffic in the downtown core at least. Let cars use the other streets. And there are other ways off making public transit faster and more viable for users.
Using the TTC in this city usually involves some delay/breakdown somewhere. Their rolling stock is badly maintained and falling apart. Buying tokens or cash fare is ridiculous in this time and age. Been to London? The Oyster card is wonderful. Arrive at Heathrow airport, fill out a quick form, pay some money down and you are on your way in 10 minutes tops. In this backward city, one can't even get to the airport n a TTC train without multiple changes of vehicles and mode of transportation. We want to be First Class, we barely manage to hang on to Third World status with our public transit system. Decades of bad management by our various levels of government. Let's work together to bring us into the 21st century before it is over.
Comment by Greig on March 1, 2011 at 2:12pm It's very frustrating that every four years the hard work of the previous government gets undone by the new. This is why things move at a glacial pace in Toronto. I've experience urban planning, transit expansion and development in other jurisdictions and Toronto is shockingly dysfunctional in this respect.
And I have to agree with Egg - it seems that Liz has not verified her sources and instead represented rumours as fact. Liz, if you're planning a political career, you're going to have to be more careful than that. I'm with Boris, during the municipal elections I thought you were a dynamic personality with great energy, but it was obvious you did not have handle on the issues. I just couldn't vote for you. I'm glad that you are staying engaged and hopefully you will have a broader knowledge base if you decide to run again.
BTW, the articulated streetcars are 23 meters in length. That took me 26 seconds to research on wikipedia. The new trains are only 4 or 5 meters longer, but will have a passenger capacity increase of 35%. For anyone who's been packed like a sardine on the current cars, or had that sinking feeling when a streetcar bursting at the seams rolls by without stopping to pick them up, will disagree that these cars will have 'little or no impact' on current riders. Not to mention that the new low-floor design will make the streetcar network accessible to those who currently cannot navigate the steep stairs. That's a huge impact. Huge.
Comment by Boris E on March 1, 2011 at 1:16pm
Comment by Liz West on March 1, 2011 at 11:37am
Comment by Liz West on March 1, 2011 at 11:32am
Comment by Greig on February 28, 2011 at 10:01am
Comment by Boris E on February 26, 2011 at 7:28pm Liz's comment on the new streetcar models is misleading. The new type of streetcar, are yes, longer, wth larger capacity and easier access. Low floor with various entrance/exit points throughout, they will speed up stops, because riders can get on and off faster then with the current models. They still make the same amount of stops as curretn models. And they are so much improvement over the rumbling, rotting pieces of scrapmetal we have running around this city. I am amazed that people like his Worstship, the Gravy Boy and Liz, who does not seem to have ever travelled anywhere far outside Ontario, both like to sound off like experts in Public transit. Have they ever been to Europe, or even cities with streetcars in the US?
I agree with Leslie Street being a bad access point for the Ashbridges Bay maintenance shed. I suggested several times during the TTC meetings , to create an additonal access point via commissioner street and link it into King or the soon to be built Queens Quay line. In additon, it is not streetcars causing traffic slow downs i this city; it is all the selfish people insisting on driving a car all by themselves. Imagine, one car trying to turn left on Queen in evening traffic, sometimes holding up up 100-300 people in various streetcars behind it.
And Liz' that BS about how the new streetcars are doing in Toronto's climate is utter hogwash. They are built by a Canadian (International) company, which surprise, surprise, have built other models for cities with similar climates. Does Kopenhagen, Stockholm, Munich, Amsterdam, Hannover - just to name a few - ring a bell? All these cities run and have run for decades very successful streetcar lines - Summer and Winter.
Comment by Liz West on February 26, 2011 at 3:56pm Posted by Nolin (Admin) on February 3, 2011 at 12:21pm 4 Comments 5 Likes
© 2013 Created by Nolin (Admin).




You need to be a member of The Leslieville'r to add comments!
Join The Leslieville'r